Object
The number can be correct.
The object can still be wrong.
Physical-digital fidelity auditing
A correct number can still represent the wrong thing.
What does your digital record actually represent? LFR examines how a record came to support a claim—and where that connection still holds.
Fracture
Where representation and process separate
Claim
The record can be real.
The claim can still exceed it.
Assumption
Systems can agree.
They may have inherited the same assumption.
No change established
A check may not establish a change.
That does not establish that nothing happened. Unknown is not a failure state. An unmarked unknown is.
What LFR gives
We do not eliminate uncertainty. We locate where it begins.
LFR preserves what was observed, tests whether the record still refers to the claimed object or process, declares what was transformed, and marks where the evidence stops.
The result is a traceable observation record with stated limits—not a verdict beyond what the evidence can establish.
Method
How LFR tests the path
Preserve what arrived. Test the bridge. Declare the transformation. Qualify the claim.
Read method →Boundary
The shape of current blindness
Public pages state what cannot be seen, not only what can be measured.
Open boundaries →Fields
Where evidence is deepest now
GB Grid and Battery/BESS are current evidence environments, not the boundary of LFR.
See current fields →Return
Bring a question the record cannot answer.
Start with what happened, the records you have, the claim being made, where the connection stops being clear, and what consequence depends on getting it right.