Object
The number can be correct.
The object can still be wrong.
Physical-digital fidelity auditing
A correct number can still represent the wrong thing.
What does your digital record actually represent? LFR rebuilds the checkable path from record to object, process, transformation, and claim.
Fracture
Where representation and process separate
Claim
The record can be real.
The claim can still exceed it.
Assumption
Systems can agree.
They may have inherited the same assumption.
Null
Nothing observed does not establish that nothing occurred.
Unknown is not a failure state. An unmarked unknown is.
What LFR gives
We do not eliminate uncertainty. We locate where it begins.
Each workstream starts by freezing identity, time basis, channels, normalisation, missingness, and claim boundary. The output is an auditable observation record, not a verdict.
Method
How the discipline holds
Observable, derived, assumed, unknown, recomputable, and not established remain separate.
Read method →Boundary
The shape of current blindness
Public pages state what cannot be seen, not only what can be measured.
Open boundaries →Fields
Where evidence is deepest now
GB Grid and Battery/BESS are current evidence environments, not the boundary of LFR.
See current fields →Return
Bring a question the record cannot answer.
Start with the physical process, the records, the claim being made, where the relation stops being clear, and what consequence depends on getting it right.