The questions a technical asset manager, risk engineer, underwriter or lender should ask before buying a public-duty review. This page is not a method explainer; it answers the practical objections first.
Give us an authorised BESS basket or BMU list. The first output is a coverage map: which assets are represented in public grid records, which are not, and which records are lens-insufficient by construction.
No. An open public-duty question is not a risk score. It is a reason to request owner-held evidence.
It turns public traces into a fileable evidence request: what is visible, what remains unresolved, and what records should be requested before the file is relied on.
We say so. Not represented, lens-insufficient, and unobserved are formal outputs, not footnotes. We do not fill a public blind spot with a story.
No. Public pages are anonymous or aggregate. Named assets appear only in a client-authorised private review of that client’s own basket.
Not for the first GB Grid review. The entry review starts from public grid records and an authorised asset list. Owner-held data is requested only where a public question needs it.
A dashboard shows views. A public-duty review produces a fileable evidence boundary: what can be relied on, what cannot, and what should be requested next.
Each delivered figure carries source, retrieval time, hash trail, frozen definitions, and a recompute path. The PDF anchors what was handed over; the numbers recompute from public sources and versioned code.
A quarterly pilot for an authorised basket: a monthly Portfolio Status Sheet, a Drift Map, and a Targeted Evidence Request Pack with its Evidence Boundary Sheet where a public question stays open. Fixed-scope owner-side pilots start from £15,000 per quarter, depending on basket size and review depth; insurer-side book reviews are scoped separately. Pilot-stage delivery; every figure recomputable.
A technical asset manager preparing for renewal or refinancing; a risk engineer or technical underwriter reviewing a BESS book; a lender or DD reviewer deciding which owner-held records to request.
The public specimens below are the same artifact class the pilot delivers: dated, bounded, recomputable.
Discuss a Quarterly Public Duty Review Pilot → Data boundary: authorisation scope, confidentiality, and output scope are agreed before any asset list is received.